A global mandate to strengthen emergency, critical and operative care


the health strategist . institute

research and strategy institute — for continuous transformation
in value based health, care, and tech


Joaquim Cardoso MSc
Chief Researcher & Editor of the Site
March 31, 2023


ONE PAGE SUMMARY



  • This resolution provides an opportunity for coordinated action across countries and advocacy for emergency, critical, surgical, and anesthesia care communities. 

  • Emergency, critical, and operative care services are essential to meet people’s health needs across the life course, and the delivery of these services is not associated with any single health worker cadre, specialty, condition, or setting. 

  • The recent pandemic has highlighted the pervasive gaps in capacity, which hinder effective responses to health emergencies, and has disrupted elective surgery services, resulting in surgical backlogs for decades to come. 

  • The proposed resolution builds on and integrates the mandates of prior resolutions and provides an integrated and solid foundation for continued action and effective implementation. 

Successful implementation will require broad engagement of governments, communities, partners, and other stakeholders.







DEEP DIVE







A global mandate to strengthen emergency, critical and operative care


World Health Bulletin

Lia Tadesse, a Noor Hisham Abdullah, b Heitham Mohamed Ibrahim Awadalla, c Scott D’Amours, d Ffion Davies, e Niranjan Kissoon, f Wayne Morriss, g Bisola Onajin-Obembe, h and Teri Reynolds i


2023 Apr 1


The recent decision at the World Health Organization (WHO) Executive Board (EB152/3) to recommend that the World Health Assembly adopt a resolution on “Integrated emergency, critical and operative care for universal health coverage and protection from health emergencies” provides an extraordinary opportunity for coordinated action in countries. The decision also offers a solid foundation for ongoing advocacy across the global emergency, critical, surgical and anaesthesia care communities. Support among Member States is broad, and the proposed resolution is already formally co-sponsored by over 80 countries spanning all regions.


Emergency, critical and operative care services are an integral part of a comprehensive primary health-care approach and are essential to meet people’s health needs across the life course. 


Everyone needs primary care every day — whether attention to healthy diet and exercise, coordinated prevention or a chronic treatment regimen. 


However, most people will also need emergency, critical and operative services during their lifetime, whether for treatment of a laceration, a fracture or a fever late at night; ambulance transport, oxygen or intubation for pneumonia; placement of a chest drain after a road crash; or surgery and anaesthesia for a hernia, obstructed labour or cancer.


Emergency, critical and operative care represent a people-centred continuum, and the delivery of these services is not associated with any single health worker cadre, specialty, condition or setting. For example, nurses deliver as much emergency care around the world as doctors, and both may be trained as specialists of the first hours of care; operative care is understood to span both anaesthesia and surgery services in theatres and ambulatory centres, while surgeons and anaesthesia professionals may deliver emergency, critical and operative care in the course of a day as part of comprehensive peri-operative care and beyond. Critical care may be delivered in an ambulance or in an emergency unit, an intensive care unit or a theatre by technicians, nurses or specialist doctors. Traumatology in some countries is an orthopaedic surgical specialty; in others, a trauma fellowship may focus on critical care for the injured. Only a coordinated and strategic approach to the entire emergency, critical and operative care continuum, including rehabilitative and palliative services, can deliver effective care for people with key high-burden acute conditions, such as injury or sepsis. The distinction between emergency and critical care, between emergency and operative care or between critical and operative care is highly variable by context, and these services are highly interdependent in all contexts.


The recent pandemic revealed pervasive gaps in capacity, and has changed our understanding of health systems and emergency response. While gaps in primary, emergency or critical care directly hindered an effective response, the most disrupted category of health services was elective surgery, and many countries will struggle with the resulting surgical backlog for decades to come. As major conflicts and devastating earthquakes have overlapped the waning of the pandemic, the need for an integrated approach to emergency, critical and operative care has become even more evident. Millions of people around the world live in a protracted emergency context, and no emergency waits for the previous one to end. Only an integrated approach to the full emergency, critical and operative care continuum, linked effectively to robust primary care, can ensure effective preparedness, readiness and response.


The proposed resolution builds on, integrates and renews the mandate of prior resolutions: WHA56.24 on violence and health; WHA57.10 on road safety and health; WHA60.22 on emergency care systems; WHA64.10 on strengthening health emergency and disaster management capacities and resilience; WHA68.15 on strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia; WHA69.1 on strengthening essential public health functions; WHA70.7 on sepsis; WHA72.6 on patient safety; WHA72.16 on emergency care systems for universal health coverage; and WHA74.7 on preparedness for and response to health emergencies. We have greatly increased awareness through the mandates of these resolutions and under the banner of global emergency care, global critical care, and global surgery and anaesthesia movements. 


The proposed resolution amplifies these agendas, providing an integrated and solid foundation for continued action and effective implementation.


Successful implementation of the mandates outlined will require broad engagement of governments, communities, partners and a range of other stakeholders. 


The authors of this editorial represent the highest levels of government leadership as well as WHO and major global partner organizations; we call on our communities to come together to meet this challenge.


Originally published at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


Names mentioned


  • Dr. Thomas H. Lee, MD, MSc, Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board Co-Chair, NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Kedar S. Mate, MD, President & CEO, Institute for Healthcare Improvement; Assistant Professor of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College 
  • Allen Kachalia, MD, JD , Senior Vice President of Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine; Director, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 
  • Arjun Venkatesh, MD, MBA, MHS, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine; Chief, Emergency Services, Yale New Haven Hospital; Scientist, Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation
  • Carla C. Braxton, MD, MBA, FACS, FACHE, and Shawn Tittle, MD, Chief Medical Officer/Chief Quality Officer, Houston Methodist West and Houston Methodist Continuing Care Hospitals; Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery, Houston Methodist Academic Institute; Shawn Tittle, MD, Chief Medical Officer/Chief Quality Officer, Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital
  • Eyal Zimlichman, MD, MSc, Chief Transformation Officer & Chief Innovation Officer, Founder and Director of ARC, Sheba Medical Center
  • Jonathan B. Perlin, MD, PhD, President & CEO, The Joint Commission; Clinical Professor of Health Policy and Medicine, Vanderbilt University; Adjunct Professor of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Kaveh G. Shojania, MD, Professor and Vice Chair, Quality & Innovation, Department of Medicine, and CQuIPS Senior Scholar, University of Toronto; Staff Physician, General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Komal Bajaj, MD, MS-HPEd, Chief Quality Officer, Reproductive Geneticist, Clinical Director NYC H+H Simulation Center, Professor, Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals | Jacobi | North Central Bronx
  • Kris Vanhaecht, PhD, and Astrid Van Wilder, Msc, Leuven Institute for Health Care Policy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Leslie M. Jurecko, MD, MBA — Chief Safety, Quality and Experience Officer, Cleveland Clinic
  • Tejal Gandhi, MD, MPH, CPPS — Chief Safety and Transformation Officer, Press Ganey Associates LLC — 
  • Lee A. Fleisher, MD — CMS Chief Medical Officer and Director, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Professor Emeritus and Former Chair of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
  • Kenneth W. Kizer, MD, MPH — Adjunct Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine; Distinguished Professor Emeritus, UC Davis School of Medicine; Founding President & CEO, National Quality Forum
Total
0
Shares
Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Subscribe

PortugueseSpanishEnglish
Total
0
Share