the health strategist
institute, portal & consulting
for workforce health & economic prosperity
Joaquim Cardoso MSc.
Servant Leader, Chief Research & Strategy Officer (CRSO),
Editor in Chief and Senior Advisor
January 8, 2024
This is an Executive Summary of the article “Is the US prepared for the next pandemic?”, published by Healio on January 5, 2024.
What is the message?
The United States grapples with a dual challenge in pandemic preparedness, as highlighted by the Biden administration’s American Pandemic Preparedness Plan (AP3).
While significant strides have been proposed, including advancements in medical defenses and global health systems, the plan faces resource constraints and legislative hurdles.
Assessing the nation’s readiness for the next pandemic unveils a complex landscape marked by lessons learned from COVID-19, funding uncertainties, and the imperative for bipartisan commitment.
ONE PAGE SUMMARY
What are the key points?
American Pandemic Preparedness Plan (AP3):
Unveiled in September 2021, AP3 equates the biological threat to traditional weapons and cyberattacks, outlining comprehensive goals such as upgrading medical defenses and strengthening global health systems.
Despite its ambitious agenda, AP3 faces resource constraints, raising questions about the practical implementation of its goals, as highlighted by Jane Knisely, Pandemic Preparedness Strategy Coordinator at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Financial Challenges and Legislative Impediments:
The administration, aiming to fast-track pandemic response, introduced the National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan, emphasizing “moonshot efforts.” However, securing necessary resources depends on Congress allocating additional funding.
A 2024 budget request seeks $20 billion over five years for HHS public health agencies, including substantial investments in CDC infrastructure. Yet, the funding bills are pending, leaving the future of these initiatives uncertain.
Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy:
A new permanent office, the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy, replaces previous White House committees. Its mandate includes coordinating domestic responses, leading vaccine and technology development, and offering periodic reports to Congress on preparedness levels.
The broader legislative landscape, including the yet-to-be-reauthorized Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA), raises questions about the institutional framework for future responses.
What are the key examples?
The Biden administration’s efforts to secure additional funding face challenges, with the 2024 budget request still awaiting approval. The expiration of PAHPA funding in September adds urgency to the need for legislative action.
Surgeon and retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Paul Friedrichs leads the newly established Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy, emphasizing a centralized approach to pandemic coordination.
What are the key strategies?
The administration’s strategies hinge on the implementation of AP3 and the National Biodefense Strategy, with a focus on achieving objectives over the next 5 to 10 years.
Recognizing the necessity of a global approach, emphasis is placed on a One Health framework, acknowledging the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health.
Conclusion
As the US navigates the aftermath of COVID-19 and contemplates its readiness for future pandemics, a delicate balance between policy vision and pragmatic resource allocation emerges.
The challenges span legislative intricacies, financial uncertainties, and the imperative for a unified, bipartisan commitment.
The nation’s ability to learn from past lessons, secure necessary funding, and establish a resilient institutional framework will determine its preparedness for the inevitable uncertainties of future pandemics.
To read the original publication, click here.
